Classical Tradition in Brazil: Translation, Rewriting, and Reception
Resumen
The essay provides an overview of the dossier as a whole and assesses its contribution to current scholarship in classical reception studies. It outlines the discursive framework in which the papers, individually and collectively, inscribe themselves and highlights the ways in which they reinforce, challenge, and expand the critical horizon.Descargas
La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.
Citas
Bakogianni, A. 2013. “Introduction: In Dialogue with the Past.” In Bakogianni, 1-9.
------. (ed.) 2013. Dialogues with the Past 1: Classical Reception, Theory and Practice. London: Institute of Classical Studies, University of London.
Bassnett, S. 2011. “Prologue.” In Parker and Matthews, 1-10.
Batstone, W. W. 2006. “Provocation: The Point of Reception Theory.” In Martindale and Thomas, 14-20.
Bosher, K., Macintosh, F., McConnell, J., and Rankine, P. (eds.) 2015. Oxford Handbook of Greek Drama in the Americas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coelho, M. C. M. N. 2013. “Five Medeas: Euripides in Brazil.” In Bakogianni, 359-380.
Croce, C. 2006. “Medea from Brazil: Canonical ‘Counter-Discourse’ in Post-Colonial Latin America.” New Voices in Classical Reception Studies 1: 10-18.
Dixon, P. B. 2015. “A Brazilian Echo of Antigone’s “Collision”: Tragedy, Clean and Filthy.” In Bosher, Macintosh, McConnell, and Rankine, 380-399.
Gemelli, C. 2015. “Medea in Brazil: Interview with Director Heron Coelho.” In Bosher, Macintosh, McConnell, and Rankine, 708-725.
Goff, B. 2005. “Introduction.” In Goff, 1-24.
------. (ed.) 2005. Classics and Colonialism. London: Duckworth.
González Echevarría, R., Pupo-Walker, E., and Haberly, D. 1996. “Introduction to Volume 3.” In R. González Echevarría and E. Pupo-Walker (eds.), The Cambridge History of Latin American Literature, Volume 3: Brazilian Literature; Bibliographies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-10.
Hardwick, L. 2005. “Refiguring Classical Texts: Aspects of the Postcolonial Condition.” In Goff, 107-117.
------. 2007. “Postcolonial Studies.” In Kallendorf, 312-327.
Haynes, K. 2006. “Text, Theory, and Reception.” In Martindale and Thomas, 44-54.
Jauss, H. R. 1982. Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Trans. T. Bahti. Intr. P. de Man. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Kallendorf, C. W. 2007. A Companion to the Classical Tradition. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Laird, A. 2007. “Latin America.” In Kallendorf, 222-236.
Leonard, M. 2006. “The Uses of Reception: Derrida and the Historical Imperative.” In Martindale and Thomas, 116-126.
Martindale, C. 1993. Redeeming the Text: Latin Poetry and the Hermeneutics of Reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
------. 2006. “Introduction: Thinking Through Reception.” In Martindale and Thomas, 1-13.
------. 2007. “Reception.” In Kallendorf, 297-311.
------ and Thomas, R. F. (eds.) 2006. Classics and the Uses of Reception. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Nikoloutsos, K. P. 2012. “Introduction.” In Nikoloutsos, 1-5.
------. (ed.) 2012. Reception of Greek and Roman Drama in Latin America. Special issue of Romance Quarterly: 59.1.
Parker, J. and Matthews, T. (eds.). 2011. Tradition, Translation, Trauma: The Classic and the Modern. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rizo, E. and Henry, M. 2016. Receptions of the Classics in the African Diaspora of the Hispanophone and Lusophone Worlds: Atlantis Otherwise. New York: Lexington Books.
Santos, J. P. 2015. “The Darkening of Medea: Geographies of Race, (Dis)Placement and Identity in Agostinho Olavo’s Além do Rio (Medea).” In Bosher, Macintosh, McConnell, and Rankine, 400-416.
Schmidt, P. L. 1985. “Reception Theory and Classical Scholarship: A Plea for Convergence.” In W. M. Calder III, U.K. Goldsmith, and P. B. Kenevan (eds.), Hypatia: Essays in Classics, Comparative Literature, and Philosophy Presented to Hazel E. Barnes on her Seventieth Birthday. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Associated Press, 66-77.
Silk, M., Gildenhard, I., and Barrow, R. 2014. The Classical Tradition: Art, Literature, Thought. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
------. (ed.) 2013. Dialogues with the Past 1: Classical Reception, Theory and Practice. London: Institute of Classical Studies, University of London.
Bassnett, S. 2011. “Prologue.” In Parker and Matthews, 1-10.
Batstone, W. W. 2006. “Provocation: The Point of Reception Theory.” In Martindale and Thomas, 14-20.
Bosher, K., Macintosh, F., McConnell, J., and Rankine, P. (eds.) 2015. Oxford Handbook of Greek Drama in the Americas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coelho, M. C. M. N. 2013. “Five Medeas: Euripides in Brazil.” In Bakogianni, 359-380.
Croce, C. 2006. “Medea from Brazil: Canonical ‘Counter-Discourse’ in Post-Colonial Latin America.” New Voices in Classical Reception Studies 1: 10-18.
Dixon, P. B. 2015. “A Brazilian Echo of Antigone’s “Collision”: Tragedy, Clean and Filthy.” In Bosher, Macintosh, McConnell, and Rankine, 380-399.
Gemelli, C. 2015. “Medea in Brazil: Interview with Director Heron Coelho.” In Bosher, Macintosh, McConnell, and Rankine, 708-725.
Goff, B. 2005. “Introduction.” In Goff, 1-24.
------. (ed.) 2005. Classics and Colonialism. London: Duckworth.
González Echevarría, R., Pupo-Walker, E., and Haberly, D. 1996. “Introduction to Volume 3.” In R. González Echevarría and E. Pupo-Walker (eds.), The Cambridge History of Latin American Literature, Volume 3: Brazilian Literature; Bibliographies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-10.
Hardwick, L. 2005. “Refiguring Classical Texts: Aspects of the Postcolonial Condition.” In Goff, 107-117.
------. 2007. “Postcolonial Studies.” In Kallendorf, 312-327.
Haynes, K. 2006. “Text, Theory, and Reception.” In Martindale and Thomas, 44-54.
Jauss, H. R. 1982. Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Trans. T. Bahti. Intr. P. de Man. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Kallendorf, C. W. 2007. A Companion to the Classical Tradition. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Laird, A. 2007. “Latin America.” In Kallendorf, 222-236.
Leonard, M. 2006. “The Uses of Reception: Derrida and the Historical Imperative.” In Martindale and Thomas, 116-126.
Martindale, C. 1993. Redeeming the Text: Latin Poetry and the Hermeneutics of Reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
------. 2006. “Introduction: Thinking Through Reception.” In Martindale and Thomas, 1-13.
------. 2007. “Reception.” In Kallendorf, 297-311.
------ and Thomas, R. F. (eds.) 2006. Classics and the Uses of Reception. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Nikoloutsos, K. P. 2012. “Introduction.” In Nikoloutsos, 1-5.
------. (ed.) 2012. Reception of Greek and Roman Drama in Latin America. Special issue of Romance Quarterly: 59.1.
Parker, J. and Matthews, T. (eds.). 2011. Tradition, Translation, Trauma: The Classic and the Modern. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rizo, E. and Henry, M. 2016. Receptions of the Classics in the African Diaspora of the Hispanophone and Lusophone Worlds: Atlantis Otherwise. New York: Lexington Books.
Santos, J. P. 2015. “The Darkening of Medea: Geographies of Race, (Dis)Placement and Identity in Agostinho Olavo’s Além do Rio (Medea).” In Bosher, Macintosh, McConnell, and Rankine, 400-416.
Schmidt, P. L. 1985. “Reception Theory and Classical Scholarship: A Plea for Convergence.” In W. M. Calder III, U.K. Goldsmith, and P. B. Kenevan (eds.), Hypatia: Essays in Classics, Comparative Literature, and Philosophy Presented to Hazel E. Barnes on her Seventieth Birthday. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Associated Press, 66-77.
Silk, M., Gildenhard, I., and Barrow, R. 2014. The Classical Tradition: Art, Literature, Thought. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Publicado
2018-09-20
Sección
Artigos - Dossiê
La Revista Caletroscópio detendrá, por un periodo de tres años, los derechos autorales de todos los trabajos aceptados para publicación: artículos, reseñas, traducciones, etc. Salvo esa restricción, los trabajos están licenciados con la Licencia Creative Commons – Reconocimiento – NoComercial – SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional. Después de ese tiempo, caso el autor publique el texto, aunque sean hechos cambios en el original, se solicita que sea incluida, en nota a pie, la información de que una versión anterior del artículo fue publicada en la Revista Caletroscópio, presentando las referencias adecuadas.
