A percepção após a interpretação na filosofia da arte de Danto

  • Eduardo Coutinho Lourenço de Lima

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BORGES, Jorge Luis. Pierre Menard, autor del Quijote. In: Obras Completas I. Buenos Aires: Emecé, 1996, p. 444-450.

DANTO, Arthur C. The artworld. Journal of Philosophy, v. 6 1 , p. 571-584.

DANTO, Arthur C.. The transfi guration of the commonplace: a philosophy of art. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981.

DANTO, Arthur C. The end of art. In: The philosophical disenfranchisement of art. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986, p. 81-115.

DANTO, Arthur C. Art, philosophy, and the philosophy of Art. Humanities, v. 41, n. 1, 1983, p. 1-2.

DANTO, Arthur C.. The philosophical disenfranchisement of art. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.

DANTO, Arthur C. Indiscernibility and perception: a reply to Joseph Margolis. British Journal of Aesthetics, v. 39, 1999, p. 321-329.

DANTO, Arthur C. The pigeon within us all: a reply to three critics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, v. 59, n. 1, 2001, p. 39-44.

DANTO, Arthur C. O mundo da arte. Trad. DUARTE, Rodrigo. ArteFilosofia, v. 1, 2006, p. 13-25.

DANTO, Arthur C. A transfiguração do lugar-comum. Trad. PEREIRA, Vera. São Paulo: Cosac-Naify, 2006.

DANTO, Arthur C. Embodied meanings, isotypes, and aesthetical ideas. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, v. 65, n. 1, 2007, p. 121-129.

DAVIES, Stephen. Weitz’s anti-essentialism. In: Definitions of art. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991. Reimpresso em LAMARQUE, Paul & OLSEN, Stein Haugom (ed.). Aesthetics and the philosophy of art: the analytic tradition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2004, p. 63-68.

DICKIE, George. The new institutional theory of art. Proceedings of the 8th Wittgenstein Symposium 10, 1983, p. 57-64. Reimpresso em LAMARQUE, Paul & OLSEN, Stein Haugom (ed.). Aesthetics and the philosophy of art: the analytic tradition, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2004, p. 47-54.

FISHER, John Andrew. Is there a problem of indiscernible counterparts? Journal of Philosophy, v. 92, 1995, p. 467-84.

GOODMAN, Nelson. Languages of art. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1976.

LAMARQUE, Paul & OLSEN, Stein Haugom (ed.). Aesthetics and the philosophy of art: the analytic tradition, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2004.

LEDDY, Thomas. The Red Dust. British Journal of Aesthetics, v. 41, 2001, p. 207-221.

LEVINSON, Jerrold. Defining art historically. British Journal of Aesthetics, v. 19, 1979, p. 232-250. Reimpresso em LAMARQUE, Paul & OLSEN, Stein Haugom (ed.).

Aesthetics and the philosophy of art: the analytic tradition, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2004, p. 35-46.

MARGOLIS, Joseph. Farewell to Danto and Goodman. British Journal of Aesthetics, v. 38, 1998, p. 353-374.

MARGOLIS, Joseph. A closer look at Danto’s account of art and perception. British Journal of Aesthetics, v. 40, 2000, p. 326-339.

WEITZ, Morris. The role of theory in aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, v. 16, 1956, p. 27-35.

Published
2017-04-25
Section
Arte e Filosofia para além da estética