Assessment of learning in Statistics: knowledge emerging from a collaborative teacher training group
Abstract
This paper presents evidence of the mobilization of teaching knowledge in the field of learning assessment in Statistics. Based on the theoretical categories related to professional understandings, formulated by Lee S. Shulman, and the discussions indicated by Luckesi, on the assessment of learning, a collaborative training group for teachers is considered as a space to produce verbal records. From the group, seven meetings were recorded, transcribed and, later, analyzed, in view of the methodological assumptions of the Discourse of the Collective Subject. With that, seven speeches were constructed, being analyzed here the one that was related to the evaluation processes. In this way, the necessary knowledge of the teacher about the educational objectives, the theoretical-methodological references, in addition to the mastery of the themes and statistical contents, the contextual and curricular specificity, the learning and previous understandings of the students, circumstances that outline the actions of the teacher in the pedagogical scope.
Downloads
References
ALIAGA, M.; et al. Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education (GAISE) - College report. Alexandria/VA/USA: American Statistical Association, 2010.
ARAÚJO, Jussara de Loiola.; BORBA, Marcelo de Carvalho. Pesquisa qualitativa em Educação Matemática. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2004. (Tendências em Educação Matemática).
BATANERO, Carmen; BURRILL, Gail; READING, Chris. Overview: challenges for teaching statistics in school mathematics and preparing mathematics teachers. In: BATANERO, Carmen; BURRILL, Gail; READING, Chris (Ed.). Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics - Challenges for Teaching and Teacher Education: A Joint ICMI/IASE Study. London: Springer, 2011. p. 407- 418.
BECKER, Fernando. Educação e construção do conhecimento. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Penso, 2012.
BORN, Bárbara Barbosa; PRADO, Ana Pires do; FELIPPE, Janaína Mourão Freire Gori. Profissionalismo docente e estratégias para o seu fortalecimento: entrevista com Lee Shulman. Educação e Pesquisa, São Paulo, v. 45, jan. 2019.
DELMAS, Robert C. Statistical Literacy, Reasoning, and Thinking: a commentary. Journal of Statistics Education, v. 10, n. 2, p. 1-11, 2002. DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2002.11910674.
FIORENTINI, Dario. Pesquisar práticas colaborativas ou pesquisar colaborativamente? In: BORBA, Marcelo Carvalho; ARAÚJO, Jussara de Loiola (Orgs.). Pesquisa qualitativa em Educação Matemática. 1. ed. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2004, p. 47-76.
GAL, Iddo. Adults’ Statistical Literacy: Meanings, Components, Responsibilities. International Statistical Review, v. 70, n. 1, p. 1-51, 2002. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2002.tb00336.x.
GARFIELD, Joan; BEN-ZVI, Dani. Developing Students’ Statistical Reasoning: connecting research and teaching practice. Berlin: Springer, 2008. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8383-9
GARFIELD, Joan; FRANKLIN, Christine. Assessment of Learning, for Learning, and as Learning in Statistics Education. In: BATANERO, Carmen; BURRILL, Gail; READING, Carmen (Eds.). Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics-Challenges for Teaching and Teacher Education: A Joint ICMI/IASE Study. Springer, 2011, p. 133-145.
GARFIELD, Joan; GAL, Iddo. Assessment and Statistics Education: Current Challenges and Directions. International Statistical Review, v. 67, n. 1, p. 1-12, abr. 1999. DOI: 10.2307/1403562.
GRILLO, Marlene Correro; LIMA, Valderez Marina do Rosário. Especificidades da avaliação que convém conhecer. In: GRILLO, Marlene Correro; GESSINGER, Rosana Maria (Orgs.). Por que falar ainda em avaliação? Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS, 2010, p. 15-21.
GROSSMAN, Pamela; SCHOENFELD, Alan. O ensino do conteúdo da disciplina. In: DARLING-HAMMOND, Linda; BRANSFORD, John (Orgs.). Preparando professores para um mundo em transformação: o que devem aprender e estar aptos a fazer. 1. ed. São Paulo: Penso editora, 2019, p. 170-196.
LEFÈVRE, Fernando; LEFÈVRE, Ana Maria Cavalcanti. O Discurso do Sujeito Coletivo: um novo enfoque em pesquisa qualitativa (desdobramentos). Caxias do Sul: Educs, 2005.
LOPES, Celi E.; MENDONÇA, Luzinete O. O percurso do GIFEM: um grupo que se tornou colaborativo. Com a Palavra, o Professor, Vitória da Conquista, v. 6, n. 14, p. 255-270, jan./abr. 2021, DOI: 10.23864/cpp.v6i14.671.
LÜDKE, Menga; ANDRÉ, Marli E. D. A. Pesquisa em educação: abordagens qualitativas. São Paulo, Editora Pedagógica e Universitária. 99p, 1986.
LUCKESI, Cipriano Carlos. Avaliação da aprendizagem escolar: estudos e proposições. 22. ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 2011.
MIZUKAMI, Maria da Graça Nicoletti. Aprendizagem da docência: algumas contribuições de L. S. Shulman. Revista do Centro de Educação da UFSM, Santa Maria, v. 29, n. 2, p. 01-13, jul./ dez. 2004.
MORINE-DERSHIMER, Greta; KENT, Todd. The complex nature and sources of teachers' pedagogical knowledge. In: GESS-NEWSOME, Julie; LEDERMAN, Norman G. (Eds.) Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999. p. 21-50.
PARK, Soonhye; OLIVER, Steve. Revisiting the conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, New York, v. 38, p. 261-284, 2008.
PORCIÚNCULA, Mauren; SAMÁ, Suzi. Projetos de Aprendizagem. In: PORCIÚNCULA, Mauren; SAMÁ, Suzi (Orgs.). Educação Estatística: ações e estratégias pedagógicas no Ensino Básico e Superior. Curitiba: CRV, 2015, p. 133-141.
PONTE, João Pedro; CHAPMAN, Olive. Mathematics teachers’ knowledge and practices. In: GUTIÉRREZ, Angel; BOENO, Paolo (Eds), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: past, present, and future. Roterdham: Sense, 2006, p. 461-494.
ROSETH, Cary J.; GARFIELD, Joan; BEN-ZVI, Dani. Collaboration in Learning and Teaching Statistics, Journal of Statistics Education, v. 16, n. 1, p. 1-15, 2008. DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2008.11889557.
SACRISTÁN, José Gimeno. O currículo: uma reflexão sobre a prática. 3. ed. Tradução: Ernani F. da Fonseca Rosa. Porto Alegre: Penso, 2017.
SANTANA, Eurivalda Ribeiro dos Santos; CAZORLA, Irene Maurício. O Ciclo Investigativo no ensino de conceitos estatísticos. Revemop, Ouro Preto, Brasil, v. 2, e202018, p. 1-22, out. 2020. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33532/revemop.e202018.
SHEPARD, Lorrie; HAMMERNESS, Karen; DARLING-HAMMOND, Linda; RUST, Frances. Avaliações. In: DARLING-HAMMOND, Linda; BRANSFORD, John. Preparando os professores para um mundo em transformação. Tradução: Cristina Fumagalli Mantovani; Rev. Técnica: Luciana Vellinho Corso. Porto Alegre: Penso, 2019, p. 235-279.
SHULMAN, Lee S. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, v. 15, n. 2, p. 4-14, fev. 1986. DOI: 10.2307/1175860.
SHULMAN, Lee S. Conhecimento e ensino: fundamentos para a nova reforma. Cadernos Cenpec, São Paulo, v. 4, n. 2, p. 196-229, dez. 2014. Tradução: Leda Beck. Rev. técnica: Paula Louzano. DOI: cadernoscenpec.v4i2.293.
TACOSHI, Marina Miyuko Akutagawa; FERNANDEZ, Carmen. Knowledge of Assessment: an important component in the PCK of Chemistry teachers. Problems of Education in the Twenty First Century, Siauliai, Lithuania, v. 62, p. 124-147, 2014.
WATSON, Jane M.; CALLINGHAM, Rosemary A.; DONNE, Julie. Establishing PCK for teaching statistics. In: BATANERO, Carmen; BURRILL, Gail; READING, Carmen; ROSSMAN, Allan. (Eds.), Joint ICMI/IASE Study: Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics. Challenges for Teaching and Teacher Education. Proceedings of the ICMI Study 18 and 2008 IASE Round Table Conference. Monterrey, Mexico: ICMI and IASE, 2008, p. 1-6.
YIN, Robert K. Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. 4. ed. Tradução: Ana Thorell. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 248 p, 2010.
ZABALA, Antoni. A prática educativa: como ensinar. Tradução: Ernani F. da F. Rosa. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 1998.
Copyright (c) 2022 Revemop
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
