Philosophical Problems of Digital Governance
Abstract
Digital governance, operationalized by technologies such as blockchain and decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), constitutes a phenomenon that redefines fundamental philosophical concepts for collective life. This article undertakes a systematic philosophical analysis of this phenomenon, structured around foundational conceptual problems. We begin from four axes of inquiry: (1) the ontological problem of the nature of code-based entities; (2) the epistemic problem of trust and knowledge in algorithmic systems; (3) the normative problem of authority, legitimacy, and justice in automated governance; and (4) the logical problem of the limits of normative formalization. The analysis demonstrates that these problems materialize at the necessary intersection of philosophy with computer science, law, and economics. It concludes that digital governance is, in essence, a philosophical enterprise, whose responsible development demands prior conceptual clarity regarding the nature of collective agency, the foundations of trust, the embedding of values into code, and the structural limits of automating social normativity.
References
BUTERIN, Vitalik. Ethereum white paper: a next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. [S.l.]: Ethereum Foundation, 2014. Disponível em: https://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper/. Acesso em: 17 jan. 2025.
BUTERIN, Vitalik. CRITICAL UPDATE Re: DAO Vulnerability. [S.l.]: Ethereum Foundation Blog, 2016. Disponível em: https://blog.ethereum.org/2016/06/17/critical-update-re-dao-vulnerability/. Acesso em: 17 jan. 2025.
BUTERIN, Vitalik. Notes on Blockchain Governance. [S.l.]: Vitalik.ca, 2017. Disponível em: https://vitalik.ca/general/2017/12/17/voting.html. Acesso em: 17 jan. 2025.
DE FILIPPI, Primavera; WRIGHT, Aaron. Blockchain and the law: the rule of code. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2018.
GÖDEL, Kurt. Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, v. 38, p. 173-198, 1931.
GOLDMAN, Alvin. What is justified belief? In: PAPPAS, George (org.). Justification and knowledge. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979. p. 1-23.
HART, H. L. A. The concept of law. 2. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
LATOUR, Bruno. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
LESSIG, Lawrence. Code and other laws of cyberspace. New York: Basic Books, 1999.
MAKERDAO. The Black Thursday report. [S.l.], 2020. Disponível em: https://makerdao.com/en/blackthursday/. Acesso em: 17 jan. 2025.
NAKAMOTO, Satoshi. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. 2008. Disponível em: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf. Acesso em: 17 jan. 2025.
OSTROM, Elinor. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
REIJERS, Wessel et al. Now the code runs itself: on-chain and off-chain governance of blockchain technologies. Topoi, v. 40, p. 821-831, 2018.
SEARLE, John R. The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press, 1995.
WEBER, Max. Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.
WITTGENSTEIN, Ludwig. Philosophical investigations. Tradução de G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell, 1953.
Copyright (c) 2026 Rodrigo Cid
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright: The texts and images published in the Virtualia Journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. This license allows others to share, adapt, and build upon the published material for any purpose, even commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given to the authors and the journal. To view a copy of this license, visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
.jpg)
